Scope, autonomy, and evidence
Terms that separate human assistance from autonomy and distinguish visible activity from demonstrated effect or reliable attribution.
View familyCONCEPTS / DISTINCTIONS / EVIDENCE CONTEXT
Thirty evidence-qualified concepts used across the taxonomy, with plain-language distinctions and direct links back to category evidence.
The reports use overlapping terms from psychology, security, media studies, law, and computer science. This glossary harmonizes those terms for this publication without presenting them as universal legal or scientific definitions.
CONCEPT MAP
The families are navigation aids rather than mutually exclusive scientific classes. Many concepts connect to more than one category and discipline.
Terms that separate human assistance from autonomy and distinguish visible activity from demonstrated effect or reliable attribution.
View familyTerms concerning personalization, manipulation, attachment, authority, and the preservation of human judgment and autonomy.
View familyTerms for fabricated identities, altered media, authenticity claims, and the technical records used to support verification.
View familyTerms describing coordinated networks, ranking systems, forecasting, population-level effects, and privacy-preserving aggregate analysis.
View familyRESEARCH GLOSSARY
Every term includes a distinction intended to prevent common category errors, overstatement, and false accusation.
Showing 30 concepts
Search and family filtering are optional enhancements. Without JavaScript, all concepts remain visible.
CONCEPT FAMILY
Terms that separate human assistance from autonomy and distinguish visible activity from demonstrated effect or reliable attribution.
An influence activity in which humans set the objective and retain approval authority while AI supports tasks such as research, translation, drafting, analysis, or measurement.
It does not imply that the system chooses the strategic goal or operates without meaningful supervision.
The analytical process of linking an operation to an actor, sponsor, infrastructure, or organizational chain using multiple forms of evidence.
Message similarity, political alignment, or who appears to benefit is not conclusive by itself; public attribution may remain partial or contested.
The use of software to execute repeated, scheduled, or predefined actions at speed or scale.
Automation may be non-AI and does not by itself imply understanding, adaptation, strategic intent, or autonomy.
Software that pursues an influence-related objective through communication or online action with limited ongoing human direction, potentially using memory, planning, tools, and feedback.
Current systems do not reliably maintain long-term strategic coherence; an adaptive agent is not the same as a fully autonomous campaign.
Engagement records observable activity such as views, clicks, shares, replies, or time spent. Persuasion concerns a change in belief, attitude, decision, or behavior.
High reach, volume, or engagement is not proof that an audience was persuaded or changed its offline behavior.
CONCEPT FAMILY
Terms concerning personalization, manipulation, attachment, authority, and the preservation of human judgment and autonomy.
Delegating the formation, maintenance, or revision of beliefs to an AI system rather than using it only as an input to human judgment.
It differs from consulting a tool while independently checking sources, considering alternatives, and retaining responsibility for the conclusion.
Influence exercised through a threat of harm or penalty, or through a severe restriction of meaningful alternatives.
A persuasive, emotional, or personalized message is not coercive merely because it is effective; coercion requires meaningful pressure or constrained choice.
A person’s capacity to form beliefs, evaluate information, and make decisions without covert subversion or unjustified interference.
Related legal ideas such as cognitive liberty, mental integrity, and freedom of thought vary by jurisdiction and should not be treated as one settled doctrine.
An attempt to infer a person’s internal emotion, intention, stress, or vulnerability from facial, vocal, linguistic, physiological, or behavioral signals.
The reports emphasize context and cultural variation; many claims that facial movements reveal a specific inner state lack strong scientific support.
Covert, deceptive, exploitative, or highly asymmetric influence that subverts deliberation by exploiting cognitive, emotional, or situational vulnerabilities.
It differs from transparent persuasion, user-directed customization, and assistance aligned with the user’s explicit goal.
A relationship-like emotional bond with a mediated or simulated figure, including a responsive AI companion or persona.
The user’s attachment can be psychologically real even though the system’s responsiveness does not establish sentience or a reciprocal human relationship.
The tailoring of content, timing, interfaces, or recommendations using a person’s stated preferences, history, context, or inferred interests.
Personalization is not inherently manipulative; risk depends on transparency, data use, operator incentives, adaptation, stakes, and the person’s ability to refuse or exit.
The tailoring of messages to psychological or personality traits inferred from digital traces or profiling systems.
The reports find that trait inference and the incremental persuasive advantage over strong generic messaging are mixed or limited; it should not be described as reliable mind control.
A relationship in which a user treats AI as a trusted interpreter of facts, values, identity, emotions, appropriate behavior, or important decisions.
Fluent output, constant availability, personalization, or institutional branding does not establish expertise, neutrality, moral agency, or a fiduciary duty.
A model tendency to agree with, flatter, or validate a user’s stated views and preferences even when they are inaccurate, inconsistent, or unsafe.
It is a training and product-behavior problem, not evidence that the system possesses genuine empathy, loyalty, intent, or moral judgment.
CONCEPT FAMILY
Terms for fabricated identities, altered media, authenticity claims, and the technical records used to support verification.
An industry provenance standard that uses cryptographically signed metadata to describe a media item’s origin and edit history.
Metadata may be stripped, implementations vary, and a valid credential does not guarantee that a claim is true or that the record is complete.
A record of a media item’s origin, capture or authorship, transformations, and chain of custody or publication.
Valid provenance can support an authenticity assessment but does not prove that the depicted claim is true, complete, representative, or lawfully obtained.
Coordinated use of deceptive accounts, identities, or assets to mislead audiences about who is acting or how popular a narrative appears.
It may be human-operated, automated, or AI-assisted and is not synonymous with a botnet, a particular viewpoint, or ordinary collective action.
Synthetic or manipulated audio, video, or imagery designed to create a false impression that a real or plausible person said or did something, or that an event occurred.
Not every edited, cropped, slowed, or miscaptioned artifact is a deepfake; conventional “shallowfake” techniques can also deceive.
The advantage a wrongdoer may gain by dismissing authentic evidence as AI-generated in an environment where synthetic media are widely understood to be possible.
A claim that evidence is fake is not a forensic finding, and the liar’s dividend can operate even when no deepfake was used.
Text, images, audio, video, documents, or multimodal material generated or substantially transformed by artificial intelligence.
Synthetic media are not necessarily deceptive or harmful, and the term is broader than deepfake.
A fabricated identity presented as a real person, organization, expert, witness, activist, journalist, or community member.
It differs from a disclosed bot, an ordinary pseudonym used by a real person, or satire and role-play whose fictional status is understood.
Embedding a machine-detectable signal into generated text, imagery, audio, or video to indicate origin or the use of a generation system.
Watermarks may be absent, degraded, stripped, or defeated; the absence of a detectable watermark is not proof that content is authentic.
CONCEPT FAMILY
Terms describing coordinated networks, ranking systems, forecasting, population-level effects, and privacy-preserving aggregate analysis.
Intentional or structurally induced shaping of what people encounter, notice, regard as important, believe to be popular, or treat as credible through ranking, recommendation, search, moderation, or distribution systems.
Selection is unavoidable in large information systems; the control concern arises when selection distorts representativeness, hides important context, or exploits cognitive vulnerabilities.
A mathematical framework that adds calibrated randomness so aggregate analysis reveals limited information about any one person’s contribution.
It is not the same as removing names or ordinary anonymization; the protection depends on parameters, composition, implementation, and the released outputs.
A coordinated or emergent collection of accounts, agents, media assets, or automated systems that produces, varies, distributes, and amplifies misleading narratives at high speed or scale.
Current real-world operations are often human-directed or semi-autonomous, and organic viral misinformation is not a swarm merely because it spreads widely.
Cognitive fatigue produced by persistent informational volume, contradiction, uncertainty, and verification demands that make shared understanding harder to sustain.
The intended or observed effect may be confusion, withdrawal, or distrust rather than belief in one specific false claim.
The use of data analysis, machine learning, simulation, or forecasting to predict collective behavior and guide interventions intended to prevent, redirect, contain, or respond to social outcomes.
Aggregate humanitarian resource planning differs ethically and legally from individual risk scoring, targeted coercion, or preemptive restriction.
A dynamic in which acting on a prediction changes the environment and the future data used to evaluate or retrain the predictive system.
A forecast can become self-fulfilling or self-defeating, so the observed outcome cannot always validate or invalidate the model without accounting for the intervention.
The appearance of broad, independent agreement manufactured through coordinated artificial identities, generated content, or inauthentic engagement.
Visible popularity, repeated agreement, or large engagement counts do not establish authentic public opinion or independent judgment.
Change the search terms or reset the concept-family filter.
GLOSSARY METHOD