PUBLICATION NETWORK / EDITORIAL BOUNDARIES

Related publications

Three public-interest publications with distinct editorial roles, evidence boundaries, and update rhythms.

International Intelligence, OutrightAttack.com, and 2IA address adjacent questions from different editorial positions. Use this guide to choose a starting point without treating a cross-link as shared evidence or blanket endorsement.

Choose a publication Compare editorial scopes

Three distinct publications Scope descriptions reviewed Jul 27, 2026

CHOOSE A STARTING POINT

Match the publication to the research task.

The publications overlap in subject matter, but they are designed for different reader needs. Each card states the principal focus, typical materials, and editorial boundary.

Current publication · news and public intelligence You are here

International Intelligence

An independent, privacy-first publication for current source-attributed intelligence, public records, evidence-aware research, and defensive analysis.

Primary focus: Current developments, public accountability, public records, AI PSYOPS research, evidence methods, and privacy-preserving access.
Typical materials: Daily Briefs, current intelligence cards, research reports, public-records tools, world-event records, RSS, and read-only APIs.
Editorial boundary: Claims on this site are governed by its own source, correction, privacy, minimization, and uncertainty policies. External cross-links do not change those standards.

Related research project

OutrightAttack.com

A public-interest research project and critical archive focused on cognitive liberty, mental autonomy, algorithmic power, synthetic identity, predictive systems, and the governance of technologies that can infer or influence inner states.

Primary focus: Cognitive liberty, mental privacy, algorithmic influence, synthetic identity, predictive systems, and meaningful human control.
Typical materials: A charter initiative, research dossiers, critical essays, theme maps, a timeline, and historically contextualized archive material.
Editorial boundary: Its archive includes difficult historical and literary material. Preservation, access, and analysis do not imply endorsement, and its claims retain their own editorial status.

Sister publication · evidence archive

2IA — International Intelligence Archive

An independent, information-only archive for intelligence systems, public records, surveillance, influence operations, historical context, and source-attributed analysis. It separates sourced fact, public claims, legal findings, interpretation, uncertainty, and clearly labeled scenarios.

Primary focus: Long-form evidence, historical context, intelligence institutions, surveillance, public records, influence operations, and verification.
Typical materials: Research reports, guides, datasets, timelines, source records, topic collections, and source-attributed current developments.
Editorial boundary: 2IA separates sourced fact, public claims, legal findings, interpretation, uncertainty, and clearly labeled scenarios. Each page retains its own evidence status.

SCOPE COMPARISON

Shared subject matter does not mean identical editorial purpose.

Use the comparison as a navigation aid. It does not rank the publications, merge their evidence, or make one publication responsible for another publication’s claims.

On narrow screens, scroll horizontally to compare all columns.

Editorial-role comparison for International Intelligence and its related publications
Publication	Editorial role	Primary focus	Typical materials	Editorial boundary
International Intelligence	Current publication · news and public intelligence	Current developments, public accountability, public records, AI PSYOPS research, evidence methods, and privacy-preserving access.	Daily Briefs, current intelligence cards, research reports, public-records tools, world-event records, RSS, and read-only APIs.	Claims on this site are governed by its own source, correction, privacy, minimization, and uncertainty policies. External cross-links do not change those standards.
OutrightAttack.com	Related research project	Cognitive liberty, mental privacy, algorithmic influence, synthetic identity, predictive systems, and meaningful human control.	A charter initiative, research dossiers, critical essays, theme maps, a timeline, and historically contextualized archive material.	Its archive includes difficult historical and literary material. Preservation, access, and analysis do not imply endorsement, and its claims retain their own editorial status.
2IA — International Intelligence Archive	Sister publication · evidence archive	Long-form evidence, historical context, intelligence institutions, surveillance, public records, influence operations, and verification.	Research reports, guides, datasets, timelines, source records, topic collections, and source-attributed current developments.	2IA separates sourced fact, public claims, legal findings, interpretation, uncertainty, and clearly labeled scenarios. Each page retains its own evidence status.

CROSS-PUBLICATION RULES

How to read the network responsibly.

Each publication owns its claims.

A statement should be evaluated under the source, evidence, correction, and uncertainty rules of the publication where it appears.

A cross-link is navigation, not evidence.

The presence of a link does not verify every external claim, enroll an external site as an automated source, or transfer editorial responsibility.

Follow the underlying source trail.

For material factual, legal, or institutional claims, inspect the cited primary record or independently corroborated evidence rather than relying on the relationship between publications.

External publications change independently.

Scope descriptions are reviewed periodically, but external pages, archives, and editorial decisions may change without a simultaneous update here.

LOCAL READING PATHS

Review this publication’s own standards before carrying claims across sites.

The methodology, source registry, correction policy, and About page explain how International Intelligence handles evidence and accountability.

Read the methodology Inspect the source registry Review publication information